Through peer review, I got a lot of helpful feedback about what in my magazine works, and what needs to be changed or improved. Overall, my peers liked the cover, which had lots of colors and conveyed the main idea. I did need to add the issue date and the selling line. Overall, the most prevalent suggestion I got was about the colors. People liked the colors on the cover, but throughout the rest of the magazine, there were significantly fewer colors. It was suggested that I add a border that shares the rainbow colors of the cover to keep the theme throughout. As for my article, many people suggested that I break it up by adding photos and sections with larger text. This would make it easier to read, and it would hold the reader's attention more than the current, essay-like format. Overall, the peer feedback was helpful in giving me a general idea of what to fix. In the next few weeks, I'll work on these aspects of my magazine and make it as best as it can be.